REFORMASI HUKUM PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AIR DALAM MENGHADAPI KRISIS IKLIM DI KECAMATAN TEBO TENGAH: KAJIAN PERAN PEMERINTAH DAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT ADAT
Keywords:
Legal reform, water resources, climate crisis, government role, indigenous community participationAbstract
This research analyzes the urgency and forms of legal reform in water resource management in Tebo Tengah District, Jambi, within the context of an intensifying climate crisis. This region, characterized by its geography and reliance on water resources, faces serious challenges due to changing rainfall patterns and environmental degradation. Although water management regulations are in place, their impact has not been optimal in ensuring sustainable water availability and quality, especially for indigenous communities who possess local wisdom in water management.
The study aims to examine the role of the government in formulating and implementing adaptive legal policies, and to explore forms of participation from indigenous communities and the potential for integrating customary law with positive law in addressing the impacts of the climate crisis on water resources.
Utilizing a qualitative approach with a case study in Tebo Tengah District, data was collected through in-depth interviews with stakeholders (local government officials, indigenous community leaders, environmental experts), observations, and analysis of relevant legal documents. The research findings are expected to provide conceptual and practical recommendations for formulating water resource management regulations that are more responsive to the climate crisis, socially just, and sustainable, by positioning the local wisdom of indigenous communities as a primary pillar.
References
Garmestani, A. S., & Benson, M. H. (2013). A framework for the application of resilience in law. Environmental Law Reporter, 43(11), 10984-10991
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2017). Linking social and ecological systems:
Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge
University Press.
BPS Kabupaten Tebo. (2024). Kabupaten Tebo Dalam Angka 2024.
Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological
implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65-76.
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Schlager, E. (2016). Adaptive governance for social-
ecological systems: a synthesis and guide for practitioners. Solutions, 7(5), 52-62.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B.
(2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of
Environment and Resources, 30, 441-471.
Global Water Partnership. (2020). Integrated Water Resources Management: A
Framework for Action.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report:
Climate Change 2023. (Sesuaikan dengan laporan IPCC terbaru yang relevan).
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. (Sumber otoritatif terkini mengenai krisis iklim dan dampaknya terhadap sumber daya alam, termasuk air).
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait
Uji Materi UU Sumber Daya Air.
Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Kebijakan Nasional Adaptasi
Perubahan Iklim.
McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological systems and human behavior.
In Social-ecological systems: Toward a new synthesis (pp. 3-30). Princeton
University Press.
Nugraha, A., & Surip, N. (2021). Pengakuan Hak Masyarakat Adat dalam Pengelolaan
Sumber Daya Alam Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan
Indonesia, 8(1), 1-20.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422.
Pretty, J., & Smith, D. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 631-638
Rahardjo, S., & Sudjana, M. (2022). Hukum Adat dan Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam. Rajawali Pers
Rogers, P. P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Water Governance in the 21st Century. Global
Water Partnership
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and
Nature. Oxford University Press.
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford University Press
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2022). Indigenous Knowledge for
Climate Change Adaptation.
United Nations Water. (2023). The United Nations World Water Development Report
2023: Partnerships and Cooperation for Water. (Sesuaikan dengan laporan UN
Water terbaru).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2019 tentang Sumber Daya Air.
World Meteorological Organization. (2024). State of the Global Climate 2023
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Living and
dying in a time of monsters. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space,
1(1-2), 224-242.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.)
Sage Publications. (Referensi utama untuk metodologi studi kasus).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliastuti, Apriany Hernida, Sari Afriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
